Appellate Practice 2/28/2026

Certificate of Appealability: Strategy and Standards for Federal Habeas Cases

R

Robert Sirianni

Author

Certificate of Appealability: Strategy & Standards

By Melissa Grant

A Certificate of Appealability (COA) is required to appeal the denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Without a COA, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits.

The Legal Standard

Under Slack v. McDaniel and Miller-El v. Cockrell, an applicant must demonstrate that reasonable jurists could debate whether:

  1. The petition states a valid claim of denial of a constitutional right, OR
  2. The district court was correct in its procedural ruling

This is a threshold inquiry — the applicant need not prove the merits, only that the issues deserve further examination.

When to Seek a COA

A COA may be requested from:

  • The district court at the time of denial
  • The circuit court if the district court denies the COA
  • Both courts may be approached sequentially

Drafting Persuasive COA Applications

Focus on Debatability

  • Frame issues as genuine constitutional questions
  • Cite circuit splits or unsettled law
  • Highlight factual disputes that warrant further review

Structure and Clarity

  • Lead with the strongest issue
  • Provide concise factual background
  • Cite specific constitutional provisions at stake
  • Distinguish unfavorable precedent rather than ignoring it

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Rehashing trial arguments without constitutional framing
  • Filing boilerplate applications without case-specific analysis
  • Missing filing deadlines
  • Failing to identify the specific constitutional right at issue

Strategic Considerations

  • Request a COA from the district court first — some judges grant them liberally
  • If denied, file promptly in the circuit court
  • Consider whether the issue has broader implications that may interest the court
  • Coordinate COA strategy with any pending § 2255 proceedings

Drafting persuasive COA applications is critical for preserving the right to further appellate review.

2 Comments
Share:

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

We Value Your Privacy

We use cookies and similar technologies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and serve personalized content. By clicking "Accept All," you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy. You can manage your preferences or withdraw consent at any time.

Learn More